Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: holders khatha in Sri G P Basavarajappa vs Sri Pujari Siddappa on 15 July, 2019Matching Fragments
20. In the circumstances identity of the land, title of the owner, description varies. Insofar as revenue entries are concerned they are effected on the basis of sale deeds either listing or mentioning the matter in column No.9 of RTC or getting it mutated for the extent of 20 guntas of land is revenue act which by itself cannot confer the right on the holder of the document.
21. Mere revenue entries relating to the name of the khatha holder or the extent cannot by themselves vest indefeasible title over the subject matter. By this time it is clear that what was available for sale by the vendors of plaintiff was 14 guntas of land (i.e., 10 acres 33 guntas in both Sy.No.6/1 and Sy.No.6/2 and what was sold by them to different persons under the sale deeds stated above 10 acres 19 guntas of land balance 14 guntas). Ex.P-1 sale deed mentions 20 guntas it cannot happen and insofar as suit schedule is concerned it is 21 guntas. Thus because of the variation and claiming excess of land over the legally and practically available cannot be entertained.