Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

All the accused persons were sent for medical examination at Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital and exhibits were seized. Case property was deposited with the MHC(M). Disclosure statements of accused persons were recorded. Accused persons had pointed out the place of occurrence. Bicycle, used in the incident, was also taken into possession and was deposited with MHC(M). Statement of witnesses were recorded.

Further investigation was conducted by SI Devender Singh, who got conducted bone age X-ray of the prosecutrix and got sent the exhibits to FSL, Malviya Nagar. Before filing of the charge-sheet, the prosecutrix died. Proceedings U/s. 174 of Cr.PC were conducted by SI C.M. Meena vide DD No. 22A dated 13/08/2000. He also got conducted postmortem on the dead body vide DD No. 54B dated 14/08/2000. On completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed U/s. 363/376(2) (g)/506/120B/34 of IPC against accused Surender, Joginder , Brijesh, Ram Chander, Raj Kumar and Baljeet. Later on, FSL result was also placed on record.

Case FIR No. 300/01 was registered separately on 12/08/2000. DD No. 76B was received regarding burning of a girl at D-172, Inder Enclave, Phase-II, in front of Fakir dealer by SI C.M. Meena, who alongwith Constable Sanjay Kumar reached at the spot and came to know that prosecutrix had already been removed to LNJP hospital. They both reached at the hospital and came to know that prosecutrix had died. Both the police officials came back to the spot and recorded statement of one Roop Kishore, father of the prosecutrix.

Roop Kishore has further stated that whenever either prosecutrix or any member of their family used to pass in front of the house of accused Surender, then mother of accused Surender, namely, Urmila (since expired) and sister Pinch used to taunt them by saying that they were not in favour of seeing the face of suchlike girl and she should die by putting herself on fire. They were having passage to go anywhere from the front of the house of accused Surender only.

Roop Kishore has further stated that one day, due to some work, he was going from there with his daughter i.e. prosecutrix, then Urmila (since expired), mother of accused Surender and his sister Pintu taunted that one girl in their family was raped, so, they killed that girl themselves and the prosecutrix should die by setting herself on fire.

The postmortem of deceased/prosecutrix was conducted by Dr. R.K. Bansal. PW11 Dr. Sunil has been examined in place of Dr. R.K. Bansal. He has stated that he has seen postmortem report of the deceased dated 14/08/2000. The body was sent by SI C.M. Meena of PS Sultanpuri. On internal examination of pelvic cavity, there was hymenal tear present at 6.0 clock position. No fresh tear was present. Vaginal opening easily admitted two fingers and showed whitey exudate. Two vaginal slides were prepared and handed over to the IO. Death was due to shock consequent upon 100 percent burn injuries. PW11 Dr. Sunil has identified writing and signatures of Dr. R.K. Bansal on postmortem report Ex. PW11/A. So, it is also not disputed that prosecutrix died due to 100% burn injuries,which she sustained as she committed suicide.