Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

"By way of interim relief, prayer (a) is granted."

The learned Senior Counsel prayer than referred to prayer

(a) which reads as under :-

(a) pass an order directing that no Civil Court or other Authority or Forum shall entertain a suit or other proceedings in respect of any claim or related matters pertaining to PACL Ltd. and /or its Directors/promoters/group/companies/entities/indivi 2 of 15 Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:135819 COCP-2342-2023 (O&M) 3-

2023:PHHC:135819 duals etc., arraying therein as parties/defendants/ respondents the Justice (Retd.) R.M. Lodha Committee (in the mater of PACL Ltd.), and/or its Chairman and/or its Members and/or the Securities and Exchange Board of India and further no injunction shall be granted by any Court or other authority or Forum in respect of any action taken or to be taken by the Justice (Retd.) R.M. Lodha Committee (in the matter of PACL Ltd.) and/or its Chairman and/or its Members and/or the Securities and Exchange Board of India, with respect to claims and/or for matter(s) relating to investments/deposits etc. in/with PACL Ltd. or its Directors/Promoters/Group/Companies/Entitles/Indi viduals etc."

Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that again on 25.7.2016, the following order was passed :-

"Heard the learned counsel.
Prayer in terms of para (a) is granted, which reads thus :-
'(a) Pass an order directing that PACL Ltd. And/or its Directors/Promoters/agents/ employees/ group and/ or associates companies be restrained from in any manner selling/transferring/ alienating any of the properties wherein PACL has, in any manner, a rightly/interest situated either within or outside India"

Learned Senior counsel has also referred to the two orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court to submit that the interpretation of the interim order qua Clause-(a) cannot be read in a manner that the partition proceedings cannot take place as it was only with regard to the claim of the investors relating to M/s PACL Limited and person like Surjit Singh and Sukhdev Singh, who are the original land owner have every right to seek partition of land.

13 of 15 Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:135819 COCP-2342-2023 (O&M) 14- 2023:PHHC:135819 In reply, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has argued that in view of both the orders passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court on 2.6.20216 and 31.8.2016, no partition proceedings can be initiated. However, it is not disputed that an appeal challenging the order of the partition is pending before the Appellate Court.