Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: unsigned statement in Sh. Amir Ahmad vs Union Of India on 14 January, 2013Matching Fragments
2.6 Plaintiff claims that CBI recorded statement of witnesses against the plaintiff behind his back and plaintiff specifically requested the Superintendent of Police (defendant No.5), vide letter dated 30.01.1981, to record his statement but he was told that his statement was not required. Even the investigating Officer of CBI (defendant No.
16), submitted his report behind the back of plaintiff in 1981 without giving opportunity to the plaintiff to explain correct facts. Allegedly the report of investigating officer of CBI was fabricated, manufactured, had false evidence against the plaintiff, and was based on unsigned statements of witnesses. Plaintiff claims that those witnesses denied having given any such statement.