Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. The facts, as narrated by the applicants in the OA ore that pursuant fo Employment Notice No.1 /2001 published on 09.06.2001 fhe applicants being eligible applied for 33 nos of vacancies of Traffic Inspector in the scole of Pay of Rs.500-9300. Selection result was published on 03.08.2008 and the applicants were selected, the "applicant nos. 1 to § joined as Traffic Apprentice on 10.01.2008, applicant nos. 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12 & 13 on 10.04.2008, applicant no? on 09.04.2008. Thereafter they were sent for training. On account of implementation of 6 CPC recommendation, their pay scale was revised to Page Sof 22 Rs 9300-34800 + GP Rs.4200 per month. Seniority list as on 01.04.2011 was published showing the applicant's senionty from the date of joining the training.
5. DrJ.L Sarkar, learned counsel for the applicants supmifted that before the 4% CPC scale employees in scale OA No.040/00382/2016 OA No.040/00382/2016 of @s.4500-7500 {ASM} were promoted to next higher Grade of @5.5000-8000 and thereafter an completion of residency period were promoted fo grade of Rs.5500-9000/-. The Commercial Apprentice/Traffic Apprentice are direct recut in scale of Rs.S500-7000/-. Learned counsel contended that there is no scape of the employees {private
-spondents) in scale of Rs.400-7000/-. or Rs. 5000-B8000/- to have a march over the applicants direct recults inasmuch as 'he persons (private respondents} in the lower grades were not promoted at all when applicants the direct recuits were appointed against vacancies of 2001. The 6&® CPC merged the grades of Rs.4500-7000, Rs.§000-8000 and Rs.5500-9000 into one grace of Rs.9300-34800 + Grade Pay of Rs.4200/-, Thus, the private resoondenis in the lower grades of Rs.4500-7500 and Rs.5000-8000/- came to such Rs.9300-34800 no} by promotion following procedure of promotion against percentage of promotion as mandated by Rules. They were given the benefit of higher grade by process of merger.

10. "We have heard the learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings. documenis placed before US.

Ve. We have also perused fhe decision of the Hyderabad Rench relled upon by the learned counsel for the apolicanis. For better elucidation, operative portion of said) order is reproduced below.

e Brief tacts of ihe case are that the applicanis were selected oas Dy Stafion | Supat/ Traffic Apprentice/Commercial Apprentice in the scale of | Pay of Rs.5500-9000 and sent for Training. Affer training they were posied as Stafion Masters W/TsCommercial inspectors In PB 9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200 in different divisions coming under znd respondent, The Respondenis issued ihe seniority ist for ine said OA No.040/00382/2016 scale of Pay correctly showing the seniority of the applicants. With the implementation of the 6th pay commission the grades of Rs 5O00-8000 and Rs S500- 9000 were merged into PB of Rs 9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs 4200. As per Si. Circular 107/202 clause (i) and fi) the seniority of employees who joined between 1.1.2006 anc 49.2008 would be protecied as per ihe pre-revised scale of pay and clause (ii) states that those who join on or affer 59.2008 with ihe merged scale in P& 9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs 4200 will be assigned a seniority below those who were in position as on 4,9.2008. Accordingly ine- senioriiy wos revised and. the opplicanis were placed below Those who we>re drawing lower scale of pay of Rs.S000-€000 prior fo the rnerger of scales by ihe éin CPC. Hence the grievance and therefore the OAs. oe