Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Anti-defection law in V.Senthil Balaji vs State Rep.By on 31 October, 2022Matching Fragments
5.The learned counsel further contended that the statement of witnesses would show that receiving of money was between other persons only. Roping the petitioner with receiving money is unbelievable version. This petitioner neither promised nor gave assurance to any job seekers.
6.The learned Senior counsel further contended that the petitioner https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.224 of 2021, Crl.O.P.Nos.13914, 15122 & 6621 of 2021 became MLA on the AIADMK decade at 14th Legislative Assembly Election during the period 2016. Subsequently in the year 2017, speaker by using Anti Defection Law expelled him. In the year 2018, he joined DMK party and elected as DMK MLA during bye-election in the year 2019. The FIR in Crime No.298 of 2017 was registered on 09.09.2017 against four persons namely, this petitioner, Prabhu, Sahayarajan and Annaraj on the direction of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.18773 of 2017. Thereafter, the petitioner was roped by the investigating officer due to the change of political scenario. Due to the malice from political intention, this petitioner has been roped with these three criminal cases.