Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
(xi) The Apex Court has held in case of Devraj Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in AIR (2004) SC 1975 that the facts of the case and pleadings would govern the grant of interim relief . In a given case, relief is required to be granted which may amount to granting of final relief, but the patent ignorance of provision of law, if prima facie held to be existing, then Court should not hesitate in granting relief, which may amount to granting final relief. However, at the same time the proper safeguards to be taken to see to it that because of interim relief parties may not be put to any disadvantage on account thereof. Therefore, in the instant case, as the balance of convenience is in favour of the petitioners and in case if the existing Mujavar is permitted to perform Mujavary, then it is a permission to him without following procedure of Section 64(2), therefore, this would not be permitted. At the same time the staying of the order would also be required to be made in the interest of justice with appropriate restrictions to be imposed upon the petitioners so that hereafter and till the final disposal, there may not be any change which may jeopardize the interest of parties, therefore, the impugned order is stayed. The petitioner no.2 may perform Mujavary, records of income received hereafter may be kept and periodically be submitted to the Wakf Board. The Wakf Board shall be at all liberty under the law to inspect at the reasonable time after notice the activities and/or the functioning of Wakf . The property be kept and maintained properly and no alienation of any property and/or income bearing the minimum requirement for maintaining be incurred. The report of income should be made at fortnight to the Wakf Board and Wakf Board, as it is stated hereinabove shall have full power, authority to inspect. The undertaking be filed in this Court with a copy to Wakf Board that no property in any manner would be alienated which are there on the record. As result of this order the Board and Mamlatdar shall restore back the possession of property and books of Wakf if any to the petitioners as if the impugned order had not been passed but the petitioners are restrained from alienating the wakf property in any manner they are not to deal with the wakf property except for managing it and maintaining it.