Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

8. The following are the three charges levelled against the applicant:

'Article No. I That Sri N. Suresh babu, Postman, Varkala SO while working as Postman, Attingal HPO during the period from 10.8.2003 to 17.12.04 treated TVM AG's PO Money order No. A 5703 dated 1.12.2004 of Rs. 2000 payable to Smt. F. Rafeeka, Thazhamonkonath Veedu, between church and service station, Market Road, Attingal as paid on 2.12.04 without obtaining signature/thumb impression of the actual payee on the money order form and without paying the value of the money order to the actual payee violating the Rule 127(1) of the Postal manual volume VI part III, 6th edition and thereby exhibited lack of integrity and devotion to duty and behaved in a manner unbecoming of Government Servant in contravention to Rule 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(iii) of CCS (Conduct) rules, 1964.

Article II That Sri N. Suresh babu, Postman, Varkala SO while working as Postman, Attingal HO during the period from 10.8.03 to 17.12.04 treated FPO No. 748 Money order No. 1949 dated 8.11.04 for Rs. 3000 payable to Smt. Priya Harikumar, Veeranamcode House, Thottavaram, Attingal as paid on 17.11.04 without obtaining signature/thump impression of the actual payee on the money order form and without paying the value of the money order on the money order form and without paying the value of the money order to the actual payee violating the Rule 127(1) of the Postal Manual Volume VI part III, 6th edition and thereby exhibited lack of integrity and devotion to duty and behave in a manner unbecoming of govt. servant in contravention to Rule 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(iii) of CCS (Conduct) rules, 1964.

Article III That Sri N. Suresh babu, Postman, Varkala SO while working as Postman, Attingal HO during the period from 10.8.03 to 17.12.04 treated Jhotwara Money order No. 2367 dated 9.8.04 for Rs. 500 payable to Smt. Girija Vikraman, Sarassavilas, Kodumon, Attingal as paid on 13.8.04 without obtaining signature/thumb impression of the actual payee on the money order form and without paying the value of the money order to the actual payee violating the 127(1) of Postal Manual Volume VI part III, 6th edition and thereby exhibited lack of integrity and devotion to duty and behave in a manner unbecoming of govt. servant in contravention to Rule 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(iii) of CCS (Conduct) rules, 1964.' It is accompanied by the statement of imputations in support of the charges referred to above. Entire details regarding the non- delivery/non-payment of the amounts covered by the money orders to the respective payees are naratted therein.