Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

18. The challenge to the jurisdiction of the Chief Justice or his designate in respect of a domestic arbitration is quite different from the nature of challenge that can be made in respect of an international commercial arbitration. Section 11(12)(b) in which reference to Section 2(1)(e) of the Act is found, applies to cases other than international commerical arbitrations. The matter before the Supreme Court in the Rodemadan India Ltd. case related to an international commercial arbitration. The distinction between the two kinds of arbitration for which different procedures for reference have been charted out in Section 11, has been made in clauses (a) and (b) of Sub-section (12) thereof. Since a request for reference or constitution of an arbitral tribunal in respect of an international commercial arbitration can only be made to the Chief Justice of India, there can be no situation of the kind that has arisen out of the agreement between the parties herein. It is only in respect of domestic arbitrations that requests may be validly made to more than one Chief Justice for reference. The validity of each request will be tested upon the conditions found in Section 2(1)(e) of the Act. Simply put, a request under Section 11(6) [or Section 11(4) or Section 11(5)] would have been validly made if such Chief Justice presides over a Court that could have received a suit founded on the same cause of action of the referring party, if such Court exercises original jurisdiction, or, otherwise, if the Court over which the Chief Justice presides, exercises superintendence within the meaning of Article 227 of the Constitution over the Court which would have been entitled to receive a suit founded on the same cause of action of the referring party. If an agreement is made at an office in the Dalhousie area of Calcutta which is required to be performed in Bangalore and is repudiated by a notice communicated to a party's office in Ahmedabad, the Chief Justice of this Court, the High Court of Karnataka and the High Court of Gujarat, or their respective designates, would be empowered to receive a request for a reference in respect of matters covered by the relevant arbitration agreement.