Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

12. It is discernible that the Appellate Authority has considered the Judges' observations, the marks of the 2025:KER:318 WP(C) NO. 245 OF 2025 rival teams and the Stage Manager's report and have rejected the petitioner's appeal by the impugned order.

13. The Judges and Appellate Authorities of the Kalolsavam judge the competition as per the regulations that are in vogue. They cannot be equated with judicial or quasi-judicial functionaries. Their function is confined to judging the competition based on the participant's performance in each event. Their wisdom and reason are final in such matters. Even otherwise, the purported delay in starting the competition and the defects on the stage were equally applicable to all the performing teams.