Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parole system in Taslim vs State Of Haryana And Others on 3 December, 2024Matching Fragments
8. It has been further emphasized by the learned counsel that the parole serves as an essential facet of the reformative criminal justice system, enabling convicts to maintain familial ties, rebuild community connections, and prepare for eventual reintegration into mainstream society.
9. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that no material facts or evidence support the apprehension of absconding. On the contrary, the petitioner's impeccable conduct since his incarceration and the absence of any other criminal record strengthen his case for parole.
16. Further, conditions can always be imposed to mitigate any potential risks associated with parole. These may include execution of bonds, provision of sureties, and adherence to a strict code of conduct during the parole period. The State has failed to demonstrate why such safeguards would not suffice in this case.
4 of 5 Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:162034
17. Denying parole on the basis of vague and generalized apprehensions undermines the very purpose of the reformative justice system. Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Asfaq (supra) emphasized the significance of parole in ensuring that prisoners are not alienated from their families and society, a process that is crucial for their successful rehabilitation.