Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

public interest. He further 'sub-hxfule' (3) submitted that, for the purpose of the to be measured aiong the ncmcsi.pamwayhy ordinarily reaches, adopting of the shop or mid-point hospital or ofice as the 100 meters as taken from the raids» point of the the gate or the entrance of the religious or as the case may be. from where can reach the shop. He further that, cannot be undexstood to mean that the has a mute along with the foot path and then cross the that a zebra cross or at a place where it is ear- , igr oiossing. The object behind this rule is to prevent 33 to a consumer of liquor to the shop from the i T institution or a religious institution as the case may it cannot be understood to man that the consumer, who has easy access to the place othezwise than the zebra crossing .17..

27. He also V» has been conducted ner taken by the authority, the authority ehe licence detrimental to the pgblic .S117..:S}3e1*:A:.7:i1ev learned Counsel appearing for the mspoooeooo that, Rule 5 restricts the liquor shop ego" of 100 metexs. Rule 5 has to be understood stxiej; moo. He submitted that there is a median dividing them is no legal opening to cmss the mad. If the , _ is to be taken from the footpath to zebra cross and to shop, it is much more than 100 meters. Under the provisions of Karnataka Trafic Contno1Act, the authorities have

-23.

got right to regulate the Home and under the Kamatalca Traific Central Regulations, the pedestrian cannot cross mad _ he has to cross the mad only when there is a _ pedestrian crossing such as zebra crossing. He V' " 9 opening of median referred to by the "i "an:

opening and it is supported by the letter the= ed 'V written to the Bangalore ' T the median and also for fl that the Trafic Control Act the opening of median. Just be treated as the opening atisi1hb1e"to3.t the entrance of the shop.

opened by the Police and law requires that there has to be a pedestrian cross. to cross the mad. In the light of these requirements, the distance has to be measured from the foot path and the zebra cross and to the I}3i£i*p0iD.t of the shop esiiti cannot be measuxeti from the mid-point of the shop A V' point of the institution straightaway. i

30. He also disputed the by , Commissioner and stated that prepared a sketch. but has not 'He faixther submitted that, when there it requires evidence and this decide the disputed facts: He there is an alternative remedy under Act by means of appeal to the Deputy; ' ienci when there is a statutory the petitioner cannot invoke the yun' 'adiction I _v theconstitutioii.