Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: VPF in Chandramma W/O Mruthyunjappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009Matching Fragments
25. Accordingly. we allow the appeal partly. WeVcon_firm the conviction of the Acctused Nos.2 and 3__j"fo:'fj_~o.ffe:;ces punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the VPf:()hibidiVionV Act and so also Section 498~A of IPC,' Iria_{ri1f;gu'regard fo. .:_iIi'.e they have spent in custody. there is E}V(;-Ahfléfid E;o.a'7;ii;e:f t'he"jpe'1'io'dq of sentence imposed.
26. The corivin:-iE.io;-1 Act'-L_1_seEi~.A No.2 for offences punishabie under._Sectio13.s.:.302':01';also 304-13 is set aside. The (toniiurictiloh :}'--\cc§=;1';s*'ed4_NoV.?;for-»an offence punishable under Secti_o11 34 of IPC is set aside.