Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: suicide note in Ram Chander vs State Of Punjab on 15 December, 2023Matching Fragments
2 of 21 Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:161877 2023:PHHC:161877 CRM-M-9276-2017 (O & M) ::3::
(202)
was found from the pocket of his pant, where in the details of the persons and their names who compelled my father to commit suicide, has been given and my father has signed the suicide note at its end and I identify the same. A legal action may kindly be taken against the persons named in the suicide note and they have compelled my father to commit suicide. I have recorded my statement t you in the presence of my uncle Rajan Singh. After recording my statement same has been read over to me your which is admitted to be correct. Action may be taken against the persons named in the suicide note. Time is about 14:00 Taran Kumar Rajan Singh attested Satwinder Singh 657 GRP police post Railway Police Rajpura dated 29.05.2016."
court. Thereafter when I demanded my chques then Jaskirat Singh told me that they have been sent to the company and further told whatever information gets from there he shall informed me. He did not guide me properly and thereafter Jaskirat Singh along with her brother and friend presented the chques in the Bank and harassed me mantelly and also issued threats that he shall ruin me. Sarabjit also threatened me in court that he shall kill me and no one can do anything against him. Regarding this I also given the complaint along with my wife to PS Division No 4 but the police officials did not accept my application and told that they shall see to it. It is due to the same that I have taken this step. If you people do not punish them then in future they shall trap another person like me in their conspiracy and shall die. Pandit Sohan Lal and son Bunty started telling me to give Rs. 60000 and that after getting the amount from me on 10.07.2015 they will get the cases withdrawn pertaining to Kuldeep Singh and Sanjiv Kumar. But after receiving the money they did not get the cased withdrawn. Jaskirat Singh and Sarabjit Singh have connived and taken me to a point where I am committing suicide for the second time Surinder Pal Sharma advocate is also involved with them because they have shown this dream to the advocate that the gold worth rupees crores pertaining to the Maharajs Raja's time is present in our house, which we will dig it out, out of which you have to give us some share. And the remaining cases filed by us, he will contest those cases free of cost. Kindly consider this letter and take action. In this suicide note neither my parents, brother, sisters nor my in-laws, my wife, son and daughter are responsible for my death. The persons whose names are written in this suicide note are responsible for my death".
5. Though, as many as 18 persons had been named in the FIR.
The report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. was prepared on 27.07.2016 whereas the supplementary challan was prepared on 18.01.2017 against Jaskirat Singh, Sharanjit Singh, Gurpreet Singh, Ram Chander (petitioner), Kuldeep Singh, Sanjeev Kumar and Samir Kumar.
6. Thereafter, the instant petition came to be filed.
7. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was not named in the FIR. However, as he was named in the suicide note allegedly written by the deceased, the name of the petitioner finds mention in the police proceedings. He contends that a reading of the FIR alongwith the police proceedings, the suicide note and the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. of Neelam does not, in any manner, suggest that the petitioner had committed the offence for which he had been charge- sheeted. In fact, a bare perusal of the suicide note and the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. would only go to show that the petitioner had been named therein with sketchy allegations of him threatening the deceased. He further contends that the proceedings qua co-accused, namely, Sharanjit Singh, Jaskirat Singh, Kuldeep Singh and Gurpreet Singh already stand quashed by this Court. The case of the petitioner was on a better footing and therefore, the proceedings qua the petitioner was also liable to be quashed.
20 of 21 Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:161877 2023:PHHC:161877 CRM-M-9276-2017 (O & M) ::21::(202)
"16. Even, otherwise, merely being named in a suicide note would not by itself establish the guilt of an accused until the ingredients of an offence are made out. In the present case, taking the suicide note to be absolutely correct, the allegations therein do not constitute an offence for which the petitioner can be prosecuted".