Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

6. He submits that in the present case also, the impugned order came to be passed in view of the FIR bearing no. RC-2182025A0014 dated 30.06.2025, which was a reason for passing of an impugned order in the said case as well.

7. In view of the above, issue notice. Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, learned CGSC accepts notice on behalf of the respondent no.1/UOI. Likewise, Mr. T. Singhdev, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 4 accepts notice.

8. On a query posed by the Court as to whether the facts of the present matter are identical to the one in LPA 564/2025, the answer of Mr. T. Singhdev is in affirmative.

9. He, however, contends that this Court does not have the territorial jurisdiction. Further, the petitioner has an alternative efficacious statutory This is a digitally signed order.