Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

54. Pertinently, the writ petitioner in Affidavit-in-reply pleaded as under:

"26. I say that without considering the first letter issued by the CCPD dated 06.12.2018, the respondent Bank started pressurizing the petitioner for reversion through the Zonal Office Patna and his immediate superior Mr. G. Pradhan, MAT 1380 & MAT 1381 of 2024 2025:CHC-AS:1566-DB Chief Manager of Patna Zonal Office, called the petitioner at least 5 times over phone upto 18.12.2018 for fresh reversion seeking letter. Copies of the call list are annexed herewith and marked as "R-3". The respondent Bank Authorities further requested CCPD to drop the case on 29.12.2018 mentioning that they accepted the petitioner's request for reversion. A copy of the letter dated 29.12.2018 is annexed hereto and marked as "R-4".

Furthermore, if the inward Dak register of HRDD/HRMD and MD secretariat of H.O. for December 2018 is looked into to ascertain the receipt of the CCPD letter dated 6.12.2018 advising the respondent Bank to follow the guidelines for Handicapped employees and the petitioner's letter requesting for reversion from Scale-IV to Scale-III under compelling circumstances, it would be evident that the letter of CCPD reached HO before the petitioner's letter and still the respondent bank decided to ignore the letter of CCPD and demote the petitioner, implying discrimination against OH employees."