Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parat sarkar in Baljinder Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 22 January, 2014Matching Fragments
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the same share has been mentioned in the Parat Sarkar which is not in possession of the petitioner but is in possession of the tehsil office. The petitioner has joined the office on 23.6.2007.
Learned State counsel has placed on record Parat Sarkar in which also share of Gurpreet Singh has been mentioned as 433/857. So, it is yet to be determined who has made alteration in the record. The record in possession of the tehsil office contains the same entry i.e. 433/857 share of Gurpreet Singh.