Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: unapproved plot in Sri.S.A.Govindegowda vs Smt.Sharadamma on 8 June, 2022Matching Fragments
18. Plaintiff further stated that after purchase of the land, Shri. C.R. Krupad formed unapproved layout and sold plots to different persons. Some of these alienations were by way of general power of attorney coupled with possession. One such purchaser was Smt. S.R. Bhagyamma, who purchased suit schedule property, executed sale deed-Ex.P.11 in favour of plaintiff. Said purchase is reflected in Ex.P.17 - encumbrance certificate. From Ex.P.18- encumbrance certificate from 24.05.2004 to 01.08.2012, it is seen that there are no other encumbrances on the suit property. In addition to above documents, plaintiff produced tax paid receipts for 2008- 2009 to 2012-2013 as Exs.P.12 to P.16 and for 2013-2014 as Ex.P.10. In order to further substantiate his possession over suit schedule property, plaintiff produced electricity consumption bill issued by BESCOM on 23.03.2012 as Ex.P.19. Though, plaintiff has not produced copy of building plan or licence for putting up construction of building over suit schedule property, he has produced copy of positive photograph of building as Ex.P.20 and it's negative as Ex.P.21.
43. Plaintiff - PW1 has deposed that after purchase of the land, Shri. C.R. Krupad formed unapproved layout and sold plots to different persons. One such purchaser was Smt.Surya, who had purchased suit schedule property, executed sale deed-Ex.P.1 in favour of plaintiff, reflected in Ex.P.13 - encumbrance certificate. From Ex.P.18 - encumbrance certificate from 01.04.1971 to 31.03.2004, it is seen that there are no other encumbrances in respect of Sy.No.96/2. In addition to above documents, plaintiff produced self-assessment Form and tax paid receipts - Ex.P.2 to P.11 respectively. Plaintiff produced electricity bill as per Ex.P.15. Though, plaintiff has not produced copy of building plan or licence for putting up construction of building on suit schedule property, he has produced copy of positive photograph of building and it's negative as Ex.P.16.
68. Plaintiff - PW1 has deposed that after purchase of land, Shri. C.R. Krupad formed unapproved layout and sold plots to different persons. Some of the alienations were by way of GPA with possession. One such purchaser was Smt.Jayamma, who purchased suit schedule property by way of GPA. She executed sale deed-Ex.P.1 in favour of plaintiff on behalf of Shri. H. Gangadharappa. This sale is reflected in Ex.P.7- encumbrance certificate. In addition to above document, plaintiff produced tax paid receipts - Ex.P.2 to P.6 respectively and electricity bill as per Ex.P.8. Though, plaintiff has not produced copy of building plan or licence for putting up construction of building on suit schedule property and copy of positive photograph of building and it's negative as Ex.P.9.
95. PW1- plaintiff has deposed that after purchase of the land, Shri. C.R. Krupad formed unapproved layout and sold plots to different persons. Some of the alienations were by way of GPA with possession. One such purchaser was Shri. S.K. Nazeer, who purchased suit schedule property by way of GPA on 24.03.1988. He executed sale deed-Ex.P.1 in favour of plaintiff on behalf of Shri. C.R. Krupad, which is reflected in Ex.P.8 - encumbrance certificate. In addition to above document, plaintiff produced tax paid receipts - Ex.P.2 to P.7 respectively. Plaintiff produced encumbrance certificates as per Exs.P.8 and P.9 and electricity bills of the year 2012 as Exs.P.10 and P.11. Though, plaintiff has not produced copy of building plan or licence for putting up construction of building on suit schedule property, he has produced copy of positive photograph of building and it's negative as Ex.P.12.