Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

-3- ALS-92-2025 is by unauthorized witness and for all above reasons, he justifies the order of acquittal and prays to refuse leave.

4. In the line of above submissions, evidence on record is visited. PW1 Shashank seems to be the sanctioning authority; PW2 Govind seems to be the complainant, who set law into motion; PW3 Shankar is the shadow panch; PW4 Mayur seems to be the Police Constable of ACB Office; PW5 Chandrashekar is an expert who issued Hash Value certificate of the recording of voice samples; and PW6 Sahebrao is the another Investigating Officer.

11. PW4 Mayur seems to be the Police Constable, who was assigned the work of recording the conversation in DVR and drawing script and issuing certificate 65-B. While under cross, he is unable to state in whose custody Exh.50 was lying for a period from 28.02.2015 to 09.01.2018. He admitted that, Exh.48 and 49, which are certificate of possession and removal of hash value and conversation Exh.48 drawn from the memory card, does not bear his signature. Therefore, the exercise of issuance of 65-B certificate is not free from doubt. For said reasons, case of prosecution is rendered doubtful.