Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(Respondent No.3) has also contacted respondent No. 5 to deploy HRTC staff at Bus Stand for the proper management of HRTC buses and private concern, at the bus stand which is evident from the letter dt. 13-01-2014 attached herewith as Annexure R-2 for the kind perusal of of this Hon'ble Court. As per letter dated 13-1-2014, the respondent No.3 has requested Regional Manager HRTC to deploy HRTC staff at Bus stand Hamirpur to implement the rt timing schedule of private and HRTC buses at the earliest so that proper law and other could be maintain in and around the bus stand in question. These letters clearly shows that respondent No.3 came in action only on the request of replying respondent because the private bus operator did not show their schedule time and route permits to the HRTC staff deployed for the said purpose as the result they use to park the buses for more time as provided in the joint time table which resulted into congestion and unauthorized parking. The respondent No. 5 also requested the respondent No.3 as per letter dated 24.10.2013 annexed herein as Annexure R-3. These letter clearly shows that the HRTC employee are not harassing any private operator as alleged in the petitioner on the contrary they are just assisting in removing the traffic congestion inside the bus stand Hamirpur at the request of respondent No.3 which is evident from letter dated 13-01- 2014. As such the Writ Petition is totally wrong and without any merits same is liable to be dismissed as based on wrong facts."