Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: unsigned statement in State vs . Amit Etc. Fir 163/14 (57337/16) on 31 May, 2019Matching Fragments
In his cross examination on behalf of accused Hassan, PW 1 deposed that he did not know the accused persons; that he could not recognize the person who had assaulted him for the reason that 'faces of those persons were full of colour' on account of Holi; that Investigating Officer informed him about the name of the accused; and that he could not identify as to who is accused Amit and who is accused Hassan.
In cross examination on behalf of accused Amit, PW 1 deposed that there was no quarrel with him prior to the assault on his head from back side. He further stated that site plan was prepared at his instance. However, in the site plan as also the testimony of Investigating Officer, presence of Abhishek is reflected since his State Vs. AMIT ETC. FIR 163/14 (57337/16) signature appears on the site plan. This witness was shown the statements recorded by the police Mark PW1/DA and Mark PW 1/DB, which he claimed bore his signatures but infact the statements were unsigned.