Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

14. Mr.Madon, the learned Senior Counsel contended that finally what is sought to be relied upon on is a document and a which print-out ig was which stored was in also the relied computer upon of before Mr.Haria the learned Single Judge and the same is also relied upon before us. The said print-out indicates that the draft document has been sent by one Mr.Dinesh Chandra to Mr.Shantilal V. Haria, Chartered Accountant on 8th November,2004 at 11.45 a.m. The said communication also indicates that the document has been saved as "ecc-Memorandumbyharia". Mr.Madon, also pointed out that neither the learned Arbitrator nor the Appellants categorically state that as to when the aforesaid MOU was exactly executed, in which place and at what time. Mr.Madon stated that all these facts are very relevant since, the said document appears to be a draft. It only mentions _____day (blank) of November,2004. Similarly, at the end of said document also it does not indicate that the same was signed by any of the parties. Mr.Madon also contended that the Dedhia Group did not have a copy of this document. Mr.Madon, the learned Senior Counsel pointed out that even though the aforesaid MOU was drafted by Mr.Haria the same is not averred by him in both the Affidavits filed by him.