Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: BDR in Smt. Sunita W/O Prashanth And Ors vs The State Of Karnataka & Ors on 1 October, 2013Matching Fragments
Petitioners are before this Court praying for the following reliefs:
a) issue a writ of certiorari, any other writ or direction to quash the impugned notice bearing No.KIADB/13/BDR/DDO/543/ 2013-14, dated 28.09.2013, KIADB/13/BDR /DDO/472/2013-14, dated 16.09.2013, KIADB/13/ BDR/DDO/532/2013-14, dated 16.09.2013, KIADB/ 13/BDR/DDO/537/ 2013-14, dated 16/27.09.2013 KIADB/13/ BDR/DDO/479/2013-14, dated 08-07/ 16.09.2013, KIADB/13/BDR/DDO/534/ 2013-14, dated 16/27.09.2013, KIADB/13/ BDR/DDO/533/ 2013-14, dated 16/ 27.09.2013, KIADB/13/BDR/ DDO/478/ 2013-14, dated 16.09.2013, KIADB/13/ BDR/DDO/480/2013-14, dated 16.09.2013, KIADB/13/BDR/DDO/488/2013-14, dated 16.09.2013, KIADB/13/BDR/DDO/474/2013-
14, dated 16.09.2013, KIADB/13/BDR/ DDO/481/2013-14, dated 08-07/ 27.09.2013, KIADB/13/BDR/DDO/471/ 2013-14, dated 16.09.2013, KIADB/13/ BDR/DDO/482/2013-14, dated 08-07/ 27.09.2013, along with the copy of the decision taken by the Board in the alleged 322nd meeting held on 11.03.2013 as at Annexures-D to D13 respectively, issued by 3rd respondent authority.
b) A writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to permit the