Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

5. AIR 1977SC 1481 (Para 4)

6. 2008(1)ARBLR490(Delhi) (Para 6) __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 04/04/2025 08:30:30 pm ) W.P. Nos.33396 of 2019 and etc., batch learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the 1 st petitioner company. It was submitted that Forensic Audit Report (hereinafter referred as “FAR”) is irrelevant to present writ petitions which are confined to order of DRT and DRAT. That FAR and its conclusion are sub-judice before NCLT and would have no bearing on correctness of orders of DRT and DRAT which are the subject matter of challenge in this batch of writ petitions. That FAR cannot be relied upon for it was not part of pleadings before DRT or DRAT.