Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

23. In the case at hand, initially when the suit was filed in relation to the rented shop in question, it was pleaded by plaintiff that the original defendant Kalicharan was in Government job and after death of original tenant Naval Kishore, the tenancy rights do not devolve upon him. Defendant Kalicharan took a plea that shop was taken on rent in the capacity of Karta of Hindu Undivided (13 of 33) [CSA-113/2010] Family in the name of his younger brother Naval Kishore and therefore, defendant Kalicharan as well as after his death the other successors who were brought on record as defendants, claimed devolution of tenancy rights to them in respect of the shop in question. Issues No.1 and 3 were also framed in that respect.