Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

13. Accused Nos. 1 and 2 have been charged for the offence of conspiracy under Section 120-B of the IPC in committing offence viz. of cheating by impersonation under Section, 419 of the IPC, forgery under Sections 564, 468 of the IPC and 471 of the IPC, for causing hurt with intent to commit offence under Section 328 of the IPC, wrongful confinement under Section 342 of the IPC, for extortion and murder under Sections 387, 302 of the IPC and under section 201 of the IPC for causing disappearance of evidence or giving false information to screen offender. Abduction under Section 346-A of the IPC. Causing hurt under Section 328 of the IPC and of murder under section 302 of the IPC are major offences and the evidence is much interlinked with these charges.

each, and in default awarded further rigorous imprisonment for three months. We agree with the extent of sentence given by the learned Sessions Judge.

83. It is submitted that the prosecution has proved that the Accused have committed the offence of forgery in respect of creating and using fake driving licence in the name of Rui Raj Mathur and thus has committed offence under Section 465 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. Section 465 is the penal section. For committing offence of forgery a false document i.e. driving licence in the name of Rui Raj Mathur was prepared and used. While committing forgery the Accused Nos. 1 and 2 had intention that the said document would be used for the purpose of cheating. The prosecution could prove that the driving licence which stood in the name of Rui Raj Mathur was used for the purpose of obtaining Mobile SIM card from the Cell Phone Company and thus, the prosecution could establish the offence under Section 465 and 468 of the Indian penal Code. Punishment given by the learned Sessions Judge of two months rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5000/-, and in default to suffer RI for three months for the offence proved under section 465 read with section 120-b of the IPC and the punishment of five years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/- in default, 3 months for the offence punishable under Section 468 is appropriate.