Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: implied grant in India Awake For Transparency vs Mr. Azim Hasham Premji on 18 January, 2021Matching Fragments
8.2. In this regard he relies upon para 14 of the decision in Vimlesh Kumari Kulshrestha -v- Sambhajirao and Another [(2008)5 SCC 58] which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:
"14. The application filed for withdrawal of the suit categorically stated about the pendency of the earlier suit. Respondent, therefore was aware thereof. They objected to the withdrawal of the suit only on the ground that legal costs therefor should be paid. The said objection was accepted by the learned Trial Court. Respondent even accepted the costs as directed by the Court, granting permission to withdraw the suit. In a situation of this nature, we are of the opinion that an inference in regard to grant of permission can also be drawn from the conduct of the parties as also the Order passed by the Court. It is trite that even a presumption of implied grant can be drawn."