Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

4. It had been further stated that the Asset Manager, who had taken charge, had violated the rules and directed the reviewing authority to reduce the rating of the petitioner from A+ to A. It was also stated that he was posted in Chennai/Karaikal after serving 3½ years at Assam and 9½ years at Ahmedabad. It was further stated that he had obtained marks under the normalisation method in his college, his colleagues started to make comments about him. They treated him disrespectfully. It is also stated that though he was the sectional head, he was not provided seating arrangements for more than one year and nine months at Rajahmundry. The General Manager (D) twice misbehaved with him in Rajahmundry. His PARS of three years were not filled by the controlling officer. It was further stated https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/03/2025 02:54:28 pm ) that he was transferred to Chennai without rectification of the PARs and the transfer order was issued on 12.01.2007. The officers, who had misbehaved with him and had harassed him went scot-free and no action had been taken against them. The petitioner further stated that the reviewing officer for the year 2008-2009 PAR after listening to the then Deputy General Manager (E) had stated ill of the petitioner to the reviewing authority. Therefore, it was reduced to A from A+ without assigning any reasons.