Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file.

4. From bare perusal of petition under section 12 of D.V. Act, it is evident that respondent has filed this petition before court below against the petitioners herein, with allegation that the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.l remained in live-in relationship with each other and this relation may turned into sexual cohabitation with each other and due to this cohabitation the petitioner no.1 conceived pregnancy and finally during the month of November, 2017 petitioner no.1 and respondent no.1 entered into Nikahnama and consequently they started living as husband and wife and out of said relations petitioner no.2 took birth who is presently 43 days old and is milk sucking baby and living with petitioner no.1 and rest of the respondents are relative of respondent No.1 and are relatives of petitioner No.1 through in laws relations; that shortly after the marriage all the respondents started taunting, harassing beating and abusing the petitioner No.1 with filthy language for bringing less dowry and in connection with bringing less dowry also threatened petitioner No.1 of dire consequences of murder. More so, the respondents also used abusive language towards the family members of the petitioner intentionally and deliberately with the intention to humiliate the petitioner and her parent/brothers in society; that the respondents also threatening the petitioner No.1 that they shall damage and set ablaze the dowry/gift items of petitioner and also openly threatening for disposing of all apparel jewelry and property of petitioner No.1; that the respondent No.1 being person of means having sufficient moveable/immoveable property is not providing any sort of maintenance to the petitioner No.1 and her minor child and the petitioner No.1 due to poverty is not in a position to maintain herself and her minor child, and the petitioner requires reasonable residence/maintenance for meeting out the daily needs for herself and her minor child and the daily need of petitioners exceeds Rs.2000/- keeping in view the rising price index of present inflationary time whereas the respondent No.1 is a person of means having sufficient moveable and immovable property and his monthly income from all sources is not less than Rs. 02 lac as respondent No.1 is also a Driver by profession; that if the maintenance as prayed herein is not granted in favour of aggrieved petitioner No.1 and her minor child then in that eventuality the petitioner shall die due to starvation; that the petitioner has requested the respondent No.1 to pay maintenance to her and her minor child and rest of respondents who are relatives of respondent No.1 are also requested not to raise aforesaid type of heinous threats towards petitioner No.1 and her family members but the respondents turned deaf ear to accede to the request of petitioner and continuously committing aforesaid acts of domestic violence; that the respondents are time and again repeating the said acts of domestic violence, and these acts of respondents resulted in mental pain and sufferings to the petitioner No.1 as on aiding and abetting of each other the respondents are taunting and harassing the petitioner by beating, thrashing her on many occasion and due to said joint act of respondents the petitioner sought the compensation from the loss thus suffered from the act of torture etc of respondents which resulted to aggrieved petitioner No.1 moreover, if the personal bond with sureties is not obtained from the respondents for preventing/repeating the said act of domestic violence then in that eventuality petitioner No.1 may suffer severest mental torture etc. which results irreparable loss to the life/reputation of the aggrieved petitioner No.1 and her family members.