Madhya Pradesh High Court
Daryawani @ Daryani Paradhi, vs State Of Madhya Pradesh, Through ... on 4 March, 2025
Author: Sanjay Dwivedi
Bench: Sanjay Dwivedi
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:10095
1 MCRC-9156-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY DWIVEDI
ON THE 4 th OF MARCH, 2025
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 9156 of 2025
DARYAWANI @ DARYANI PARADHI,
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, THROUGH STATION HOUSE
OFFICER, P.S. BADERA, DISTRACT- MAIHAR
Appearance:
Shri Shourabh Kumar Sharma - Advocate for the applicant.
Shri Amit Bhurrak - Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.
ORDER
This is the third application filed by the applicant under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) for grant of regular bail relating to FIR/Crime No.187/2023 registered at Police Station Badera, District Satna, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 294, 323, 324, 506 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant is in jail since 24.06.2023.
2. The applicant's earlier bail application got dismissed vide order dated 12.09.2024 passed in M.Cr.C. No.38024 of 2024. However, the applicant was at liberty to revive the prayer of bail on the ground of delay in trial.
3. By producing order-sheet, learned counsel for the applicant has tried to show that there is delay in trial and as such, taking into account the liberty earlier granted to the applicant and his custody period, he may be enlarged on bail.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: DEVASHISH MISHRA Signing time: 3/5/2025 11:16:20 AMNEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:10095 2 MCRC-9156-2025
4. On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that looking to the nature of crime committed by the applicant, it cannot be presumed that there is delay in trial.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, on perusal of case diary and taking into account the fact that there is delay in trial as last witness came to the Court on 05.04.2024 and thereafter, nobody turned up to the Court, I am inclined to allow this application. Thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this application is allowed.
6. It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his appearance before the said Court on all such dates as may be fixed by that Court in this regard during the pendency of trial.
7. On being released, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 480(3) of BNSS.
(SANJAY DWIVEDI) JUDGE dm Signature Not Verified Signed by: DEVASHISH MISHRA Signing time: 3/5/2025 11:16:20 AM