Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: material surplus in Satyendra Kumar Shukla vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 28 November, 2024Matching Fragments
8. It is evident that the petitioner herein is prima facie connected with the company named Trimurty Sales Corporation and not Harihar International Pvt. Ltd, the accused in this case.
9. On the other hand, Ld. Counsel for the State has placed the case diary and submits that the letter issued by Indian Oil Corp. Ltd. dated 04.03.2020 shows that the present petitioner along with other accused persons had visited their site as representatives of Harihar International Pvt. Ltd. The said letter also shows that surplus material belonging to Harihar International Pvt. Ltd. for which Indian Oil Corp. Ltd. did not make any payment were taken out by Harihar International Pvt. Ltd. after termination of contract. Another letter issued by the Indian Oil Corp. Ltd. dated 14.02.2017 has been addressed to M/s. Harihar International Pvt. Ltd. calling for the attention of the present petitioner. The letter prima facie shows that the Page : 7 CRR 225 of 2022 petitioner was prima facie involved in the supervision of the construction of the administrative building and security block of the said company.