Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

15. Our High Court has on more than one occasion, dealt with the effect of inclusion of the name of the individual in the patta under UDR without notice and without enquiry to the original patta holder and pleased to hold that such patta issued without notice to patta holder is not proper and valid, and is in violation of the principles of natural justice and the same confers no right upon the parties, whose name is so included. The reported judgments are : (i) 2008 (4) CTC 193 DB Madras High Court (Malar Kodi and 6 others Vs. the Secretary to Government); (ii) 2006 (1) MLJ 423 (Lingappa Gounder Vs. Palanisamy Gounder and others); (iii) 2000 (1) TNLJ 102 (Kaliyuga Kannan Vs. The Thasildar, Land Survey and others) and (iv) 1999 (3) LW 727 (Kummavar Sangam Vs. Mani). The learned brother Justice A.K.Rajan, in the judgment reported in Indian Kanoon.org/doc/890297 in Chinnammal Vs. Malaya Gounder, dated 03.09.2002, had an occasion to consider the accuracy and correctness of UDR Patta and it is observed by the learned Brother Judge that it is a known fact that updating Register Pattas are granted without taking much care and most of updating register pattas were found to be not accurate.