Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

8. Per contra, Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 3, opposes the prayers and places on record a document containing inputs on behalf of the said Respondents, which has been handed over across the board. The same is taken on record. Additionally, Mr. T. Singhdev, Advocate, standing counsel for NMC (which although is not a party to the petition), was requested to assist the court, and has also been heard at length. His written submissions have been received by e-mail and are also taken on record.

20. In light of the aforenoted reasons, there is no merit in the instant petition. Dismissed. The next date of 26th September 2022 stands cancelled.

21. The Court thanks Mr. T. Singhdev, Advocate, for his able assistance.

SANJEEV NARULA, J SEPTEMBER 2, 2022/nk Order dated 8th January, 2021 in SLP(C) No. 14953/2020 titled Purushottam v. The Union of India and Ors.