Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: continuous nuisance in Gulam Husain Mirza vs Laxmidas Premji Alias Sagar Premji And ... on 15 December, 1983Matching Fragments
20. This submission of the learned Counsel is fallacious. In is not only a continuing nuisance or annoyance that can be in issue under that provision. The language employed by section 13(1)(c) of the Act clearly shows that it has a reference to the conduct which may be past, present or continuing. The words used are "has been guilty of conduct" and these words do not admit the acceptance of the submission that when the matter goes to Court, the conduct must be continuing. In the very nature of things, this could not be so. All competed acts of indecent and unpleasurable behaviour could be put in issue under the clause.