Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: section 91 mcs act in M/S. Akash Pruthvi Lifestyle vs Akash Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. And Another on 26 August, 2013Matching Fragments
18. Again in the case of Tarkude Hotels Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Rupee Co-operative Bank Ltd. and others5, this Court (Coram: S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) has inter alia held as follows:
"19. ... ......However, when it comes to section 10 of CPC, it is more than clear that one cannot lose sight of the fact that section 10 cannot be invoked by applying the tests as if the proceedings before the co-operative court filed by way of disputes are akin to a suit in a civil court.... ....The proceedings may be civil in nature but that does not mean that the Court trying them is a civil court and the proceedings are a "suit" within the meaning of CPC. A right to bring in a suit is an inherent right vested in the litigant and, therefore, while clarifying as to what would be the jurisdiction of the Civil Court to try suits in Section 9 read with the explanation, it would at once become clear by Section 10 that the Court, which is a civil court, is mandated not to proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same title where such suit is pending in the same or any other court having jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed or in any court beyond the limits of India, established or continued by the Central Government and having like jurisdiction or before the Supreme Court. The sweep of power under section 10 can by no means be read into the MCS Act 5 2011 (11) LJSOFT 83 and particularly section 91 to 98 thereof."