Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Doubling Projects in Ramchandran Alias Vethu vs The State on 7 April, 1994Matching Fragments
5. The accused, when questioned under section 313 Cr.P.C. as respects the incriminating circumstances appearing in evidence against him, denied his complicity in the crime. He did not choose to examine any witness on his side.
6. Mr. K. V. Sridharan, learned Counsel for the appellant-accused wound project double-fanged submission as follows :
1) The facts and circumstances of the case, if sifted, scanned, and analysed in proper perspective, on the touch-stone of probabilities, would unerringly point out that the prosecution faced a dismal failure, in establishing its case beyond any shadow of doubt, the consequence of which is, there is no other go except to acquit the appellant-accused, by giving him the benefit of reasonable doubt, and consequently, setting aside the conviction and sentence, as had been imposed on him by the Court below :