Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

D) That the decision having been taken to enhance the subscription from Rs.2/- to Rs.5/-, the amendment to the Constitution was a mere formality, that no member had made any grievance in respect of the said enhancement of subscription as the subscription was being paid by the check off system. 

    BGP.                                                                                    9 of 35


     Reserved Jt in WP-9311-16.doc.

    E)                That   in   respect   of   retention   of   cash   by   Shri.   B.   S.   More,

16. Discrepancy between the membership claimed and the membership found on verification :-

On verification of the documents, it is found that the membership of the Petitioner Union for the period 2002-2007 is found BGP. 23 of 35 Reserved Jt in WP-9311-16.doc.
varying, than the claim made for the particular year. This is sought to be attributed to the fact that the same is on account of the fact that some members have not paid their subscription for the particular year. In my view, the said stand cannot be accepted in view of the fact that it is the case of the petitioner that the subscription was recovered by the check off system, and that no member had any grievance about the enhanced subscription. The said fact only proves that the Petition is not aware of its exact membership and therefore reflects on the manner in which the affairs of the Petitioner are being conducted.