Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: semicolon in Dinesh Kumar And Others vs Union Of India And Others on 4 April, 2024Matching Fragments
OR Diploma in Engineering or its equivalent in Mechanical/ Production/ Industrial/ Fabrication from State Board of Technical Education of any State Government with two years practical/ teaching experience.
ii) Hindi/ Sanskrit upto Matric Standard or higher education."
31. We are afraid that the judgment passed by Allahabad High Court failed to take notice of the fact that under Entry 66 of the Union List, the standard of education does not include vocational training. In fact, even under Entry 25 of List III (Concurrent List) of Schedule Seventh, it is apparent that while the education, including technical education, medical education and universities have been made subject to the provisions of entries 63, 64, 65 and 66 of List I; and a semicolon (;) has been added, whereafter the words 'vocational and technical training of labour' have been mentioned.
16 of 20
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:045189-DB
CWP No. 37892 of 2018 2024:PHHC:045189-DB -17-
32. The aforesaid semicolon used in Entry 25 of List III cannot be ignored and has to be understood and the Legislative intent is apparent to keep vocational and labour training independent from the control of the Central Government. The Allahabad High Court in Pawan Kumar Sagar's case (supra) has observed as under:-