Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

7. I have given my thoughtful consideration to whole aspects of matter. The status report of crime branch reads as under:-

On 12.11.2011TahiraBano approached before Crime Branch, Kashmirwith acomplaint duly endorsed by chief judicial magistrate Srinagar. The complainant inter-allia alleges that she had purchased a piece ofland measuring 04 kanals under Khasra No. 165/2545 min, Khewat No. 210/234 at village Rawalpora in the year 1981. Subsequently the said land was muted in her favour in the concerned revenue records by mutation order No. 2451. The possession of the said land remained with her undisturbed since its purchase. The complainant being an old lady and because of the death of her husband is not in a position to look after her estates effectively. The complainant approached the concerned revenue authorities for proper demarcation of her land situated at Rawalpora. The concerned patwari initially declined to demarcate the, land on the pretext that the map aksi-i-Latha is not clear. After persuasion the complaint obtained the map from Director Land (Revenue) Records. The complainant further stated that she was surprised to know the transfer of her land by virtue of a fake and fraudulent gift deed purportedly executed in the year 1994 in favour of Sh. Wali Mohammad Sheikh. The above named Wali Mohammad Sheikh had a furtherance of a criminal conspiracy with the revenue officials of manipulated a gift deed and mutated the land in his favour. The said Wali Mohammad Sheikh has subsequently sold the land to a third party in-lieu of hand-some amount etc. Consequent to the receipt of the complaint Crime Branch Kashmir with the approval of Inspector General Of Police Crime J&K initiated a PV. During the course of enquiry Crime Branch Kashmir seized Parat-i-Sarkar of mutation No. 4585 from Tehsil Office Budgam. In the initial stage the finger prints of the complainant lady namely TahiraBano W/o Gh. Mohi-ud-din Malik R/o Rainawari Srinagar were obtained in presence of Executive Magistrate 1st Class Srinagar by finger print expert and the same alongwith the questioned finger impressions on the parat-i-sarkar under mutation No. 4585 were sent to FSL Srinagar for expert opinion. The expert in his opinion opined that the finger prints of the complainant does not match with the questioned documents i.e. parat-i-sarkar under mutation No. 4585. It is amply clear from the expert opinion that some other persons in league with revenue officials have impersonated and forged the finger prints on the questioned documents and have thereby made a false entry in revenue records.