Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: devendra jain in Cbi vs Devendra Jain & Anr. on 23 February, 2022Matching Fragments
4. Thereafter simultaneous raids were conducted at the premises of A-1 Akil Ahmad, A-2 Retnakaran Sajilal, A-3 Mahim Pratap Singh Tomar, Applicant/A-4 Devendra Jain as well as A-5 Uma Soni. All the aforesaid accused persons except A-5 were also arrested on 31.12.2021 and the material available at their Offices was taken into possession by various CBI teams. On 30.12.2021, the applicant was there in Cochin alongwith his family members where he is stated to have gone for his treatment of naturopathy. He was picked up alongwith one of his relatives SignatureNotVerified Digitally Signed By:SANGEETA ANAND SigningDate:24.02.2022 14:23:18 from his hotel room and taken to the office of CBI at Katari Kadavu, Kullar Post, Cochin, during the intervening night of 30- 31/12/2021, where purportedly he was given notice u/s 41A Cr.PC to attend the CBI office at 9:00 AM on 31.12.2021 and where ultimately he was arrested at 11:00 AM. He was produced before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernaculam from where he was brought to Delhi CBI Office on transit remand. He was produced before the Ld. Special Judge, who remanded him to police custody and from time to time his police custody has been extended till today. The two mobile phones of applicant have already been taken into possession by CBI. Similarly, the search and seizure was effected on the houses of other accused persons and the relevant material therefrom has been taken possession of and brought to Delhi."
19. From a perusal of the FIR in question, it is apparent that Akil Ahmad had demanded illegal gratification from Retnakaran Sajilal on 30.12.2021 with respect to a project of DBL in Karnataka. After approval of payment of Rs.20 lacs by respondent/Devendra Jain, Retnakaran Sajilal had directed Mahim Pratap Singh Tomar to pay the SignatureNotVerified Digitally Signed By:SANGEETA ANAND SigningDate:24.02.2022 14:23:18 aforesaid amount to Anuj Gupta at Delhi. In pursuance, the amount was carried by Sunil Kumar Verma to be paid to Anuj Gupta, who allegedly received the same for Akil Ahmad.