Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1|:

0- ac:
CI fir .
1.' ~ R.s.1'?'i:1.'94-.i.V}ai§li's'"was; extensively damaged transit. The said damage was ' edetecteds at--Jciiénnai Port and the machine
-.was _sent--._bac'Vk to the supplier for its repair.
"'1"'h"e~ .snpp.iier found that the machine was The said machine was also insured. n'AI'11e claim was preferred by the assesses with the insurance wmpan 1116 isur ice company ...ft..r a..ee-.,_ni1n_-g L... -a.,ts ca...e t- the conclusion that e machine had indeed been extensively damaged. It therefore paid a sum of Rs.15'.2.2 lakhs to the assessee as 'T29'.> e assets. dVThe._A;ssessLng Oficer, mere_ore against the price of Rs.171.94 paid byffhfi assessee. The difference amount \NhiChV"W..'fl8S_a'v. 'rot p-""61 by me "'"1sur'ice Vmpaey to assesses was w. Ltte__ off i__ P ..- L..AQC€!LvlE1; The Assessing 'noticed' in-A loss pertains to capital asset. If the i.assesS.ee i had received the assets withoute -damage, it would have .foun¢&ir'psrt'-oi"'Tt)1ock asset.-'V Since 1-.