Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: PATHANAMATHITTA in Sugathan K.R vs Jyothi on 20 June, 2003Matching Fragments
3. Heard Sri.S.Vinod Bhat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. K.R. Radhakrishnan Nair, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The second respondent though served did not appear.
4. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the marriage was solemnized at Pathanamthitta and they last resided together at Pathanamthitta and the immovable property is also situated within the jurisdiction of Pathanamthitta family court. At the time when these petitions were filed, there was only one family court, that was at Thiruvalla. Only in the year 2012 another family court was established at Pathanamathitta and the cases filed on and after a particular date alone were transferred to that court. But these petitions were filed prior to the cut of date and so they were not transferred. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the case is transferred to Pathanamthitta family court.