Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

4. A Minimum score as stipulated in the Academic Performance indicator (API) based on Performance Based Appraisal (PBAS) In Appendix-III for direct recruitment of Professors in Colleges.

5. A minimum of 10 research publications in peer reviewed or UGC listed journals.

6. A minimum 110 research score as per Appendix-ll of Table 2 as per UGC regulation, 2018.

7. A relaxation of 5% marks may be provided at the Graduate and Master's Degree levels for the SC/ST/Differently-abled (Physically and visually differently-abled) categories for the purpose of eligibility and for assessing good academic record during direct recruitment to teaching positions. The eligibility marks of 55% or an equivalent grade In a point scale wherever grading system is followed, and the relaxation of 5% to the categories mentioned above are Page No.# 26/38 permissible based on only the qualifying marks without including any grace mark procedures.

Page No.# 30/38

25. Thus, given the educational qualifications, experience, latest norms etc., which are required for being selected to the post of Principal of H.C.D.G. College, Nitaipukhuri, as per the advertisement (Annexure-4) and as prescribed by the UGC and the Government of Assam guidelines, which requires minimum score, as stipulated in the Academic Performance Indicator (API) based on Performance Based Appraisal (PBAS), in Appendix-III, a minimum of 10 research publications in peer reviewed or UGC listed journals, a minimum 110 research score as per Appendix-ll of Table 2 as per UGC regulation, 2018, this Court afraid, a person with graduation in Arts and by profession an agriculturist, without there being special experience and knowledge and training on the subject matter, i.e. academic administration, may not be capable in forming an accurate opinion in adjudging the qualification and experience of the present petitioner, which requires much higher academic qualification and expertise. That being so, he is incapable to adjudge the academic qualification of the petitioner, and consequently, incapable to form an independent opinion on his own and susceptible for being influenced by other members of the selection committee.