Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

On the basis of the aforesaid order it is contended that it is of a date subsequent to Ultra Home Construction Pvt. Ltd. supra and has held that the plaintiff can sue at Delhi if has a subordinate office at Delhi.

8. I have considered the aforesaid contentions.

9. The document at page 429 of the plaintiff‟s own documents appears to be photocopy of a page out of Annual Report of the plaintiff. The counsel for the plaintiff however controverts and draws attention to the index of the documents wherein at serial no.10, against the pages 124 to 430, the description given of the document is "Copy of various advertising brochures of the Plaintiff Company" and states that page 429 is not part of Annual Report of plaintiff but is a part of an advertising brochure of the plaintiff. However there does not appear to be any merit in the said contention. The document at page 429 from its preceding two pages which are a „Proxy Form‟ and „Attendance Slip‟, is clearly a part of the Annual Report of the plaintiff. Even otherwise it, defies logic as to why in an advertising brochure, „Corporate Information‟ would be given. A further flipping of pages shows page 429 to be a part of the Annual Report of the plaintiff for the year 2014-15 commencing from page 242.