Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. The petitioner contested the suit and disputed his relationship with the respondent. He claimed that it was Sri.B.N.Krishnaiah Setty who was the owner of the premises and who was collecting the rent and therefore, the suit was not maintainable for ejectment. He also disputed the execution of the Will in favour of the respondents and claimed that the respondents had to obtain a declaration from the competent Court. Based on these contentions, the Trial Court framed the following issues: