Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

11. Mr. S, Ramalingam, learned Counsel, appearing for the appellants, has raised the following contention's:

(1) As the trust properties are not partible, the plaintiffs cannot claim any share in the A-schedule properties nor partition of the same and the B-schedule properties are incapable of any useful purpose.
(2) The lower Court ought to have found that the plaintiffs have no right to demand any account for the income from the properties from the defendants and the plaintiffs have no right to question the leasing out of the properties.