Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: bc priority in M.P.Raja Suresh vs The District Employment Officer on 7 March, 2018Matching Fragments
8.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the first respondent states that the second respondent notified 15 vacancies for the post of Junior Engineer, vide his letter dated 11.06.2009, prescribing the educational qualifications as Diploma in Mechanical Engineering and the age limit between 18 to 30. The reservation details prescribed by the first respondent are as follows:
Reservation Number of Vacant Number of sponsoring candidates in 1:5 Ratio SC Priority 3 (Available) SC Non Priority BC Priority 2 (Available) BC Non Priority MBC Priority 1 (Circulated other Employment Candidate) MBC Non Priority OC Non Priority Total 40 + 1 The 1st respondent sponsored 40 Eligible candidate according to Age, Qualification, communal reservation prescribed by the 2nd respondent vide letter No.X2/86/09, X2/87/09, X2/88/09 dated 01.07.2009. The sponsoring list received by the 2nd respondent on 14.07.2009. For the MBC Priority category the eligible candidates were not available in Trichy Employment Office. Since this reservation was circulated all other employment office and only one Candidate list received from Chennai Technical Employment Office and sponsored to the 2nd respondent on 24.08.2009. Since the petitioner is over aged at the time of nomination his name was not considered for nomination of the 1st respondent.