Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: multi functional device in The Commissioner Commercial Tax U.P. ... vs M/S Vision Distribution Pvt. Ltd. on 11 October, 2023Matching Fragments
15. In the case of M/s Kores (India) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai reported in 2010(14)SCC 430, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed as under:
"16. The Multi Function Device comprising of computer printer, fax machine, photocopier and scanner - all-in-one, with the fast technology development, is an office equipment, which combines the foresaid three or four devices and functions in one unit, and is largely used while attached with computer, though it may be used in some respects, as stand alone equipment, or even with or without being attached to the computer, like fax machine, as a part of it. The scanner, which produces digital image of the documents canned can be used only with the aid of computers, if the scanned image has to be transmitted to any other destination, though such transmission can be made possible through mobile phone also, as contended by the learned counsels for the Revenue. With the technology fast developing, it is now possible to do so and use Multi Functional Device with remote sensors in the computer system or Wi-fi. Therefore, actual and physical connection with the computer may not be even necessary. The major user of the Multi Functional Devices, the taxability of which is in question before this Court, is as a computer printer and one study in this regard produced by the learned counsels for the Assessees by the World Book Encyclopedia, indicates that typical page consumption analysis discloses that of the total output, 67% is printed, 30% is copied and 3% is faxed. The Assessees before this Court also contended that the dominant use of Multi Functional Device in question is computer printer only, with which the documents in the computer system is printed with the help of the said equipment or machine......
17. That as a matter of fact, the entry is wider, which includes not only computer printers, but computer peripherals also. This Court finds no justification in the contention raised by the learned counsels for the Revenue, that the word peripherals has to be construed narrowly to limit and include only accessories like, mouse, webcam or keyboard, as computer peripherals, to be taxed @ 4% under the said entry, and not to include therein the Multi Functional Devices."
16. This court while considering the aspect as to whether the toner-cartradges would be part of the printer, in the case of Kores (India) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax, Lucknow, (2020) ILR 2 All 122 in paragraph Nos. 14 & 15 has held as under:-