Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: arsh in Arsh Garg @ Jaiky And Anr vs State Of Raj And Anr on 14 May, 2018Matching Fragments
Mr. Mahesh Gautam, ld. counsel appearing for complainant/ respondent No.2, has vouchsafed the factum of compromise.
On 13.02.2012 the marriage of Mst. Vaishali, complainant/ respondent No.2 was solemnized with Arsh Garg @ Jaiky, petitioner No.1. During pendency of the proceedings, differences arose and (2 of 4) [CRLMP-2476/2018] complainant/ aggrieved-wife Mst. Vaishali was compelled to lodge F.I.R. During pendency of the proceedings, better sense prevailed between the parties and the compromise was affected by them.
As per compromise, Rs. fifteen lakhs is to be paid to the complainant/respondent No.2 by the petitioner No.1.
Complainant/respondent No.2 - Mst. Vaishali, present in person, has stated that she has already received Rs. five lakhs at the time of filing of divorce petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Today, a demand draft of Rs. five lakhs has been handed over to the complainant/respondent No.2 in the Court by Arsh Garg @ Jaiky, petitioner No.1.