Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

-

Writ Petition No. 16753 of 2020 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India "to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Authorities to regularize the services of the Petitioners as Programme Assistants Computers Soil Test Lab and Farm Manager with the same benefits on par with others granted vide proceedings No.493/Ser(NT)/2014-11, Dt 31.10.2014 and also vide proceedings No.1353/Ser(T)-II/2019, Dt 20.01.2020 Technical Assistants working in AICRP scheme under ICAR plan has regularized services with a condition that as long as KVK schemes continue Programme Assistants will be working in that scheme, if KVK scheme would be discontinued Petitioners services may also be discontinued violates Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently till such time continue the Petitioners as Programme Assistants Computers Soil Test Lab and Farm Manager in their respective stations and Award costs and pass such other and further orders".

Writ Petition No. 18579 of 2020 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India "to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Authorities to regularize the services of the Petitioners as Programme Assistants (Computers) and (Lab) with the same benefit on par with others granted vide proceedings No.493/Ser(NT)/2014-11, Dt 31.10.2014 and also vide proceedings No.1353/Ser(T)-II/2019, Dt 20.01.2020 Technical Assistants working in AICRP scheme under ICAR plan has regularized services with a condition that as long as KVK schemes continue Programme Assistants will be working in that scheme, if KVK scheme would be discontinued Petitioners services may also be discontinued violates Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass such other and further orders".

6. While the matter stood thus, in the year 2014, Dr. YSR Horticulture University has issued proceedings regarding regularization of temporary services of Programme Assistants vide proceedings dated 31.10.2014 and also 20.01.2020, Technical Assistants working in AICRP scheme under ICAR plan scheme has regularized services with a condition that as long as KVK scheme continues, Programme Assistants will be working in that scheme, if KVK scheme would be discontinued their services may also be stopped. Therefore, the petitioners made representations dated 30.10.2019 etc., to extend the same benefit to them on par with other those who were regularized services with the said condition, which is not considered by the respondents. Hence inaction of the respondents is questioned in this writ petition and requested to allow the same.

7. The precise case of the petitioners in W.P.No.18579 of 2020 is that 1st petitioner was appointed as Programme Assistant (Computers) in respondent organization on 07.11.2008 and she was shifted to post of Programme Assistant (Lab) and her services were continued till date. The 2nd petitioner was appointed as Assistant (Audio Visual Aids) in the year 2008 in the 4th respondent organization and now working as Programme Assistant (Computers) since December, 2011 till date. These posts were notified by way of advertisement in the year 2008 by 4th respondent in consultation with the 1st respondent. The petitioners' appointments were done by way of interview on 06.11.2008 with a selection committee consisting of four members, which includes 4th respondent and nominee of Director of Extension of 1st respondent. While the matter stood thus, in the year 2014, Dr. YSR Horticulture University has issued proceedings regarding regularization of temporary services of Programme Assistants vide proceedings dated 31.10.2014 and also 20.01.2020, Technical Assistants working in AICRP scheme under ICAR plan scheme has regularized services with a condition that as long as KVK scheme continues, Programme Assistants will be working in that scheme, if KVK scheme would be discontinued their services may also be stopped. Therefore, the petitioners made representations dated 30.10.2019 etc., to extend the same benefit to them on par with other those who were regularized services with the said condition, which is not considered by the respondents. Hence inaction of the respondents is questioned in this writ petition and requested to allow the same.